Journalism has long been regarded as a fundamental cornerstone of democracy, primarily serving the vital purpose of providing citizens with unbiased and accurate information regarding global happenings. This medium of communication is instrumental in shaping public perceptions and holds significant influence over the accountability of those in power.
In an ideal world, these media outlets would serve solely the interests of society, with journalists acting as the protectors of democracy, charged with the duty to report without any political, financial, or ideological biases. Yet, the actual landscape is considerably more intricate, as the impact of specific interests on media operations is a persistent issue that undermines the integrity and autonomy of critical analysis.
In the absence of liberated and impartial journalism, society risks falling prey to deception and misinformation.
Misrepresentation of Information in Journalism
In this context, it is not surprising that journalism has long been involved in a worrying trend: the manipulation of information to discredit those who oppose the interests of media owners or the alliances they maintain with powerful sectors.
Specifically, public figures whose views clash with these interests are often subjected to symbolic targeting through the fabrication of falsehoods or the relentless reiteration of a singular narrative. This behavior is not an anomaly; rather, it is a widespread tactic that diminishes confidence in the media and fosters an atmosphere of societal skepticism.
Using techniques such as sensationalism, cherry picking and the dissemination of fake news, certain sectors of the press seek to undermine the reputation of others, fueling polarization and social resentment; a deliberate act of destruction of those who do not align with the interests of the journalist or the media.
The case of Odila Castillo Bonilla: a case study in media distortion
Fake news has emerged as a worldwide epidemic, serving as a critical ailment for those caught in the crosshairs of media influence. Once this misinformation circulates, the individual in question experiences a figurative demise within the society that absorbs this content.
Panamanian lawyer Odila Castillo Bonilla is an illustrative case of how media manipulation can impact a person’s life. Through a campaign of defamation, certain media have tried to discredit her personal and professional trajectory. Through techniques such as cherry picking and misrepresentation of information, these media have constructed a negative narrative aimed at undermining her reputation.
The impunity with which certain media operate underscores their manipulative tactics: only negative information regarding the lawyer is prevalent online, while her professional history remains largely inaccessible. It is clear how an individual, whose life story, educational background, viewpoints, and accomplishments in the legal sphere are overlooked, can be reduced to a name that is recognized solely due to a negative «accusation.»
Media manipulation poses a significant threat to democracy and society at large. By eroding trust in institutions and the media, such practices exacerbate polarization and weaken the very fabric of social cohesion. It is vital for civil society, politicians, and journalists alike to come together to challenge this phenomenon and advocate for a more ethical and accountable approach to journalism.
